The evaluation is based on less than 2 years of experience and only one project that is still in development. Therefore, all statements are only conditionally valid. I could not really evaluate many things, because I either lack comparative values or it came to no long-term cooperation. These points are rated as neutral.
I am of the opinion that GGT masters its field and can help well and gladly in core competence questions. Our project has somewhat different environmental conditions than normal and thus poses a different challenge to the slide bearing than in the ideal case. Here I would have liked to have had more support in the development and trust that a "not possible" will also come as an answer.
The delivery time for standard products is tiptop, but rather long for special dimensions. For me as an engineer, I would like to have a "sparing partner" with whom I can discuss requirements and solutions before I simply have to make a test purchase only to find out that I need another iteration.
I will certainly earmark GGT again as a possible supplier at the next opportunity, but will be careful to communicate my expectations clearly up front. Here, part of the bill is on me as well.
Show original
Translation