We are the initiator of the first German venture capital fund of funds, giving our investors access to Tier 1 venture capital firms. Diversification is the guarantee for success in VC. Our portfolio aims for up to 120 investments in startups. This reduces the risk associated with VC to a level comparable to a long-term equity ETF strategy.
You really notice Mr. Krahl's passion for innovation and consequently venture capital.
From a theoretical point of view, his product can only be recommended, as it basically offers the same advantages as an ETF for publicly traded assets: Simple broad diversification through just one product, starting from relatively small sums.
And I am sure that it will also prove to be extremely profitable and satisfying in practice.
PRESENTATION WAS AN EXCELLENT DIVERSIFIED CROSS-SECTION OF VENTURE CAPITAL POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES.
AND PLEASED TO VERIFY THAT MK VENTURE CAPITAL GmbH IS A SERIOUS AND CORRECT COMPANY IN ORDER TO FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF MATO KRAHL !
My brother lives for startups. He always finds new, highly interesting and innovative topics in which he then successfully invests. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that your intuition doesn't leave you.
All reviews and experiences about MK Venture Capital GmbH are the subjective opinions of those who compose and submit them | The profile owner is responsible for the contents of this page |
Profile active since 12/06/2018 | Last update: 07/28/2020
| Report profile
In order to share a review or your profile you need to publish your profile first, otherwise the link you shared is not accessible to any profile visitor.
Submit a report to ProvenExpert
Quality assurance is the top priority of ProvenExpert's terms of use and evaluation guidelines.
However, should you feel that a review is in violation of our guidelines, you can submit a request to have the review assessed by the ProvenExpert quality assurance team by using the following contact form.
Send email to reviewer
* Required fields
You have already posted this review on . Posting again might create duplication.
Continue?