I thought it was great to be accompanied through such a challenge. One of you always responded to questions, so I think all participants were well supported.
I personally did not like the products. I don't know if it's because I was already in endogenous ketosis, because I eat mostly ketogenic due to insulin resistance, but the exogenous ketones didn't really have a noticeable effect on me. Unfortunately. Then, of course, the price-performance ratio is rather lousy. And taste... well.
What I do not find good is that Christian Wenzel does not want to allow criticism. In the group, some were urged not to let out about the taste of the ketones (which I do not understand, because if they just do not like it, then that's just the way it is - of course you can then make suggestions for improvement, but they are also allowed to complain) and I can not cope with the fact that my counterpart obviously does not want to hear when I'm not feeling well ("How GOOD are you today?!") or I am urged to write a (positive) feedback. I think criticism is quite constructive, if we look at it and then possibly bring improvements, or even decide that the criticism was an isolated incident and therefore no action is needed. But to simply suppress or ignore negative feelings, thoughts or feedback I find really strange. So strange that I no longer want to receive Christian Wenzel's newsletter. And this although I am very interested in the topics of the Hippocrates Health Institute.
All the best to all the organizers! And thank you for the company!
Show original
Translation