Hello,
normally I don't go out of my way to rate something or someone. But it is so that I have been here as badly advised, as represented. I have understood here that it is a big difference whether one has a lawyer or a Verteildiger. I had a lawyer. Started from a confident attitude, then came the indictment, it was said fine or we go to the next distance. In the end almost max suspended sentence! Without consultation, the judge was contacted by phone 1 day before the hearing that we want a deal. Before the trial was discussed again to what we say yes or no. When the 3 Partein have exchanged themselves we went out to talk. Suddenly I should be glad that there is probation. On my question why? I got answers like, if you were not you I would say yes acquittal but because you are you it is so. I should be glad that it does not come worse.
On the question why the suddenly everything should be so proven, he said they see it on the basis of the indices proven. The indices or the act existed from the day of the house search up to the hearing unchanged the same! Our ace in the sleeve was an error in the indictment due to an offense that is barred by the statute of limitations and could no longer be charged. That in the worst case we can go into the revision or / and appeal. This was stopped in court, for whatever reason the lawyer demanded! In addition he took no an apprentice lawyer with him who worked on me together with him it I accept the deal to stutter the its pleading therefore. I, 33 years, who got his last sentence with 21 years of 9 months probation. I is considered thus aös NOT previously convicted! Was because of a Darknet order the 2.5 years ago, where one found me only on a bestseller list. That I allegedly ordered 2 x 200g speed 60 parts 10 g MDMA.
At the post confiscation 100 parts has been intercepted.
At the house search 7g weed have been found.
Sentenced to 1 year 9 months probation + 2000 fine incl court costs.
Thank you Mr. Bartusch and apprentice
Show original
Translation