Rogert & Ulbrich is a renowned commercial law firm. We have special expertise in consumer protection and are active for our clients throughout Europe.
In the diesel emissions scandal, we successfully represented the German Federation of Consumer... Organizations (vzbv) together with other lawyers - and thus around 400,000 aggrieved buyers of Volkswagen, Audi, Skoda and Seat vehicles with type EA 189 diesel engines - in the model declaratory action against Volkswagen AG.
Am very disappointed !!! the court case against Audi AG because of emissions scandal has lasted over two years. The lawsuit failed. The communication was exclusively by E mail. Already at the success of the first instance I was asked to give a positive rating on Google about Rogert und Ulbrich Rechtsanwälte.
I was particularly pleased that your advice and guidance continued in a very positive and effective manner despite the first settlement offer from VW that I rejected. The final settlement offer from VW without return of the vehicle, which I then accepted, was very satisfying.
The law firm represented me against Audi. A lot was promised - nothing was enforced, I invested costs and time (completely unnecessary trip to Ingolstadt to the court) for nothing, the assigned lawyer and specialist employee proved to be more than incompetent.
The lawsuit should not have been filed in the first place, because in principle it did not meet the requirements for a successful lawsuit (in this case: presence of a prohibited defeat device).
The question is why this request to the BKA was not made initially, because then the rest, including my considerable time and financial effort, could have been saved.
The law firm always assured to have the matter "under control" and did not tire of emphasizing the "advertised core competence of your law firm" in this matter.
The district court stated in the reasoning for the judgment that R&U had argued "out of the blue".
There is certainly nothing more to be said.
For me, this means: Hands off the law firm, it was rather on the money of the legal protection insurance.
This is our 2nd mandate for this law firm and in contrast to the 1st mandate ( standard case in the VW emissions scandal ) we are not satisfied here. It was about the Fiat emissions scandal in relation to our motor home.
For the following reasons we are dissatisfied :
- We initiated the procedure within the warranty period of the dealer. After the 2.deadline with immediate threat of legal action happened 4 months nothing until we asked.
- Suddenly the dealer was no longer the addressee but Fiat and the previous thrust of returning our vehicle train-for-train against delivery of a defect-free vehicle was changed without consultation with us in the return of the vehicle against purchase price refund less compensation for use. We have expressly rejected this approach from the beginning.
- Some of our last messages and notes in the online file disappeared after a short time (although they were visible before) and are therefore no longer traceable.
These are our reasons for dissatisfaction. If the communication during the case had been better / at all, this assessment would be superfluous.
We were competently represented in the VW scandal and the result was good for us. Communication was not fluid, but that was not a problem in this standard case. Overall, we are satisfied and have retained this law firm for further representation in the diesel scandal against Fiat.
The lawsuit against VW AG (emissions manipulation) proceeded to my complete satisfaction from start to finish.
I would like to praise your team for the pleasant communication.
I would like to thank attorney Fabian S. for the helpful telephone conversation regarding the settlement offer.
I would be happy to recommend him to others.
The law firm conveys sovereign legal professionalism; associated with this was the routine assessment of the situation and the corresponding drafting of the statement of claim. The legal representation of the law firm at the remote location of the hearing was also apparently based on a proven procedure with the corresponding efficiency. The only thing that would have been desirable was a closer personal transfer of information about the respective state of affairs. Here we felt somewhat underserved. The clients are generally not well versed in the law and are therefore particularly dependent on the personal transmission of the essential factual statuses.
Finally, it should be mentioned that the prediction of the law firm regarding a successful lawsuit was fully accurate. Our experience with the law firm can always be taken as a reference for the work of Rogert&Ulbrich. Thank you!
All reviews and experiences about Rogert & Ulbrich Rechtsanwälte in Partnerschaft mbB are the subjective opinions of those who compose and submit them | The profile owner is responsible for the contents of this page |
Profile active since 07/05/2019 | Last update: 09/23/2023
| Report profile
More transparency and security while looking for competent professionals
Authentic customer opinions
Take advantage of other customers' experiences: ProvenExpert's authenticated customer reviews can help you choose the right product or service.
Effective customer feedback
ProvenExpert allows the entire service spectrum of a company (e.g. customer service, consulting) to be reviewed. This way you get a detailed overview of your service quality in all areas.
ProvenExpert is free, independent, and neutral. Customers make reviews of their own accord — their opinions are not for sale. And the content of reviews cannot be influenced by money or by any other means.
A good reputation is the world's best form of advertising!
85% of all consumers trust online reviews just as much as they do personal recommendations.
Let ProvenExpert give your business a boost with the best advertising in the world: the opinions of satisfied customers.
However, should you feel that a review is in violation of our guidelines, you can submit a request to have the review assessed by the ProvenExpert quality assurance team by using the following contact form.