The law firm represented me against Audi. A lot was promised - nothing was enforced, I invested costs and time (completely unnecessary trip to Ingolstadt to the court) for nothing, the assigned lawyer and specialist employee proved to be more than incompetent.
The lawsuit should not have been filed in the first place, because in principle it did not meet the requirements for a successful lawsuit (in this case: presence of a prohibited defeat device).
The question is why this request to the BKA was not made initially, because then the rest, including my considerable time and financial effort, could have been saved.
The law firm always assured to have the matter "under control" and did not tire of emphasizing the "advertised core competence of your law firm" in this matter.
The district court stated in the reasoning for the judgment that R&U had argued "out of the blue".
There is certainly nothing more to be said.
For me, this means: Hands off the law firm, it was rather on the money of the legal protection insurance.
A very big disappointment!!!