BEITRAINING Bremen-Süd

So far, I have been able to derive personal and professional benefits from every training course that has helped me move forward. The concept and implementation are effective for me.

Always happy to come back. Very informative and the lecturer was great 👏

I really enjoyed the seminar at BEITRAINING Bremen. The content was structured in a practical and varied way so that you can find direct points of reference for your own everyday work. I found the interactive exercises and the exchange with the other participants particularly helpful, which provided a lot of new impetus. The trainer also conveyed the topics clearly and comprehensibly and responded to individual questions. All in all, a very successful event that I would be happy to recommend.

In summary, I thought the training was just great. I have nothing to criticize. The communication was perfect. Spontaneous questions, even if they caused me to stray from the topic, were always answered comprehensively. Practical exercises were very interesting. Everything was great. Thank you and I'd love to come back!

The seminar was the third day of my seminar series. Once again, I received very good input. The seminar is well organized. Mr. Rohlwing is very competent and his personality made it a great pleasure for me to take part.

I really liked the structure of the seminar.
I think this personal level in particular is good for self-development.

Discussions were left running too long, moderator should have intervened sooner. For example, we should not have had to discuss a term for tens of minutes.

The introduction took too long for me personally, I especially didn't like the reading out of the booklet, in my opinion it could have been done in half the time.

Otherwise, the content of the training was very good. Most of the content was new and the mixture of theory and practice was also very successful.

When it came to the topic of caring conversations, I questioned why a trainer took part anyway, even though he wasn't feeling well and mentioned this several times. At first I thought it was a test to see if any of us would address this and then at some point I just thought that this was not a successful role model situation.

The intro was very long, before the appointment really started, 30-45 minutes of notes were handed out and it was a very bumpy bureaucratic start. I didn't have the feeling that the trainers had studied our company beforehand. The methods were old-fashioned and not applicable to us. Unfortunately, I was very disappointed with the handout, the content of which was also outdated.

Positive aspects first:
+ The two lecturers responded very well to the change in our agenda and our need for discussion.
+ Both lecturers seemed authentic and dealt very well with the tense atmosphere and sometimes sharp comments.

What I did not like:
- The training was not tailored to our company, our level of knowledge and our needs. As a result, it seemed 'off the peg' and was of almost no use to me personally.
- It took 40 (!) minutes for the actual training to start. The time beforehand could well have been used for administrative tasks. In a room with some of the company's most expensive employees, this is too much time that could have been spent more usefully.
- The aim was to conduct discussions, but only 60 minutes were spent on this. There was no demonstration to the group and no demonstration of how to deal with cases of hardship, for example.
- There were inadequate answers to questions (e.g. "What can I do if the employee locks himself out?" -> "Off work from the first day would be a solution here"), the answers were not practical enough, with examples and comprehensible for everyone.
- The use of media was insufficient. The flipchart was far too small.
- The task was not variable enough and not challenging enough.
- Really important content, such as determining differences between absence due to motivation and absence due to illness, was not explained. Neither were possible cases of hardship (one employee had several miscarriages, one employee received a terminal diagnosis) - how do I deal with the situation and what do I have to do for myself as an FC?
- The foreword to BEITraining talks about people as a race.
- The handout is misleading. Ex: Very clear announcement: "This is not the way to go on here!
- The lecturers' specialist knowledge was inadequate in many places.
- The example with the rat bite seemed more like an afterthought "I would do it differently now" than the actual intention.