The training as a resilience trainer with Christian Hiller was unfortunately professionally as well as didactically and methodologically deficient. The first days were almost 100% frontal teaching, which consisted more of anecdotal stories without imparting knowledge (instead serving as a self-promotion of the trainer). After a feedback ( in GFK format) on Wednesday morning on the part of the participants it got a bit better. Almost no opportunity to get into doing and trying things out as a trainer. The script was meaningless and faulty and questions about it could not be answered. Course participants were dissatisfied and justified this factually and professionally in a written feedback. The answer of the owner was so unprofessional that I will unfortunately never book with BIEK again....ps: the hotel on Wangerooge was great- the only bright spot in a contentwise gloomy ( and expensive) week!
Ps: Addendum to the comment of the owner: I, as well as other of the dissatisfied participants are "from the trade" with many years of successful professional experience. Therefore, it is by no means an "opinion", but in the seminar itself as well as in the follow-up decided, constructive and solution-oriented feedback, which was not adequately implemented due to, I can only assume, lack of knowledge and / or professionalism, even afterwards. A last comment to your reference, I could have made use of the refund: de facto I and two further participants thought on the first evening about it to break off the seminar (because only in such a way a complete refund is possible with you: the break off on the first evening of the educational vacation week - mind you on Wangerooge) we decided however against it, since this does not correspond to our work ethos and world view; instead of it we still assumed at that time that after much organizational things on the first day the second day can become only better. A fallacy, as it unfortunately turned out!
Show original
Translation